Heating Rate Controller · RA-R1.1 · 26 October 2026

Equipment risk assessment

Two-channel 230 V AC controller, shared 24 V DC logic and independent externally supplied 0–60 V / 15 A heater channels.

Scope, users and status

Applies to preparation, routine supervised heating, shutdown, cleaning, and permitted maintenance of the laboratory heating-rate controller. Intended users: trained test operators, responsible electrical engineer, site safety team and authorised maintenance technicians.

Assessment status: draft — site review and approval required before live testing. Functional operation does not establish independent electrical safety approval, fail-safe output behavior, over-temperature protection or suitability for every specimen. Risk controls below must be implemented and signed off locally. This document is not a certification.
Reference documentReference Electrical Wiring R1.2 + SOP-R1.2
Equipment / areaHeating-rate controller; site/test cell to be recorded
Responsible personsOperator / test owner / electrical reviewer / H&S
Experiment-specific hazards: heating a battery, reactive material, pressurised vessel or combustible assembly can cause a hazard even after power is removed. A separate specimen/process assessment must define containment, ventilation/extraction, remote operation, fire and emergency procedures before the test. This equipment assessment does not authorise thermal-runaway or destructive tests by itself.

Risk scoring · 5 × 5 working matrix

Score Likelihood (L) and Severity (S) from 1 to 5. Calculate Risk (R) = L × S. Score once for the initial risk and again after additional controls have been implemented and verified. Use the site-approved definitions and acceptance limits if different.

Likelihood (L)
1Rare
2Unlikely
3Possible
4Likely
5Almost certain
Severity (S)
1Negligible / no injury
2Minor injury
3Moderate injury / significant loss
4Major injury / serious loss
5Fatality or catastrophic loss
Example of calculation

L = 3 and S = 4 gives R = 12.

Risk acceptability, escalation and required sign-off follow the site's own safety rules. No numerical risk score implies that equipment is approved.

The existing-control column records design features and stated arrangements, not a claim that their inspection is complete. The action column is deliberately kept separate. Complete action ownership, due date, evidence and assessment approval before using this document as a signed RA.

Risk assessment register

18 hazards · standard before/after scoring with likelihood (L), severity (S) and risk rating (R = L × S)

0 / 18 residual risks scored
Ref.Hazard and potential harmPersons at riskExisting / designed controls
(verify status)
Initial riskFurther control measures / actions requiredResidual riskAction owner / due / status
L × S = RL × S = R
RA-01 230 V AC inside controller
Potential harm: Electric shock, arc, burns, fire
Operator, maintenance staff Enclosed metal cabinet; fused/switched Schurter mains inlet; PE bonding included in R1 electrical design.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Competent inspector to check PE continuity (door and cabinet), insulation, bonding, protective-device coordination and lock-off/prove-dead method. Record acceptance.
Evidence: Mains/PE test record and isolation procedure
R—
Competent electrical inspector
Target: Before first use; after rewiring
Status / closed: __________
RA-02 External DC 0–60 V / up to 15 A per channel
Potential harm: DC short circuit, arcing, hot conductors, burns and possible shock
Operator, technician Separate external DC source for each channel; Lovato DC breaker and Electro PJP panel connectors specified in R1.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Check external PSU fault energy; approve cable, connectors, DC breaker interruption rating and accessible DC isolation. Verify wiring/polarity, secure strain relief and test disconnect.
Evidence: Protection coordination + disconnect test
R—
Electrical responsible person
Target: Before first use and each configuration change
Status / closed: __________
RA-03 Hot heater and fixture / residual heat
Potential harm: Contact burns, ignition of nearby objects
Operator, visitors Heater and fixture are external test items. The controller itself provides no physical guard or assured cooldown interlock.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Fit guarding or exclusion barrier, thermal warning labels and suitable heatproof working surface. Define safe-touch temperature and cooling confirmation.
Evidence: Guard and cooling checklist
R—
Test operator
Target: Each test
Status / closed: __________
RA-04 Excess temperature or uncontrolled heating
Potential harm: Fire, damage to equipment/specimen; severe thermal event
Operator, building occupants Omron Type K feedback, Finder mechanical contact and Crydom SSR provide regulation and commanded switching only.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Set verified controller limits and fault behaviour. Add independent, suitable over-temperature protection where foreseeable consequences require it; verify fault response with the actual load.
Evidence: Independent limit/protection verification
R—
Responsible engineer + site safety
Target: Before routine service
Status / closed: __________
RA-05 Thermocouple failure, misplacement or wrong type
Potential harm: Incorrect PV, runaway, damage, burn
Operator; specimen Omron E5CC-T accepts an external Type K thermocouple through dedicated panel input.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Secure sensor in representative position, inspect Type K polarity/extension lead, check measured PV independently, and prove response to sensor fault.
Evidence: Sensor check and fault response
R—
Operator
Target: Each test
Status / closed: __________
RA-06 Wrong programme, rate, ramp or end action
Potential harm: Unexpected fast heating, extra soak, over-temperature
Operator, test specimen Stored Omron programmes and separate heater-enable circuit allow programme selection before energising.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Review approved prg, ramp rate, peak, soak, repeats and end action against test sheet. Record start condition and start one channel at a time unless authorised otherwise.
Evidence: Signed test-specific programme sheet
R—
Operator / reviewer
Target: Each test
Status / closed: __________
RA-07 Controller RESET / output not inactive
Potential harm: Heater energises when channel ENABLE turned on
Operator, specimen Omron RUN/RESET is separate from EAO heater-enable control, but RESET output-off behaviour is not independently proven.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Document rtsm / p-on / mv-r settings. Prove SSR input and heater demand are OFF in RESET and on sensor fault using suitable test methods before applying the SOP start order.
Evidence: RESET output-off functional test
R—
Competent commissioning engineer
Target: Prior to SOP start order
Status / closed: __________
RA-08 Mismatched ENABLE / ACTIVE indication
Potential harm: Unexpected heater operation or false reassurance
Operator The reference circuit supplies ACTIVE LED+ from Finder 13.61 terminal 14 through EN1/EN2, and returns LED− through its Weidmüller demand-controlled path.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Verify HL+ comes from the correct Finder 13.61 terminal 14 (EN) and HL− remains on the Weidmüller-controlled return for BOTH channels. Check terminal-conductor capacity and test ENABLE OFF / demand ON, ENABLE ON / demand OFF, and ENABLE ON / demand ON; record results.
Evidence: Indicator truth-table check
R—
Electrical maintainer
Target: Before relying on indicators
Status / closed: __________
RA-09 Loss and restoration of mains or DC supply
Potential harm: Unexpected restart, uncontrolled heat or invalid profile
Operator, specimen Finder 13.61 step relay used for channel enable; Omron offers configurable startup behaviour.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Test mains/DC loss and restoration: Finder enable must stay OFF, Omron returns to RESET, and heater cannot restart without a deliberate operator action. Abort interrupted tests.
Evidence: Power cycle/restart test record
R—
Competent engineer / operator
Target: Commissioning, then periodic functional checks
Status / closed: __________
RA-10 DC relay/socket/SSR overload or polarity
Potential harm: Contact overheating, welded contacts, fire, loss of isolation
Operator, facility R1 specifies Finder 62.31 34(+)→14(−), Crydom DC SSR and Lovato breaker. Protection coordination is not signed off.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Check 62.31 contact polarity, actual socket rating at 15 A, coil drive, Crydom thermal derating/spacing, conductor size and DC overcurrent protection. Document duty thermal test.
Evidence: Thermal test and manufacturer rating check
R—
Competent design reviewer
Target: Before prolonged 15 A tests
Status / closed: __________
RA-11 Voltage meter branch insufficiently protected
Potential harm: Wiring fault, overheating or fire
Operator, facility PV1 and PV2 have no external input-wire fuses fitted, confirmed for the completed equipment. Murata requires 0.25 A / 300 V time-delay protection for the TB1 (+) and (−) input supply wiring; the internal self-resetting device does not protect the upstream leads. A supply-wire fault could cause overheating or fire.
Status: confirmed protection discrepancy — OPEN; not approved for live heating. Corrective action and evidence record
R—
Resolve the external TB1 (+/−) input-wire protection on both meters to the Murata 0.25 A / 300 V time-delay specification. Choose fuse/holder configuration and DC interrupt capability for the actual supply and earthing topology; verify installation, polarity, ratings and protection. Record the competent electrical inspection before release; internal meter fusing is not a substitute.
Evidence: Meter branch protection drawing + inspection
R—
Electrical designer
Target: Before revised rebuild/use as applicable
Status / closed: __________
RA-12 Wrong channel, swapped PSU/heater connections
Potential harm: Unexpected heat, polarity damage, energising wrong fixture
Operator, specimen Two independent channel circuits, colour-coded DC connectors, and separate PSU IN / HEATER OUT panel connector markings (confirm actual fitted labels).
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Fit permanent labels; check upper PSU IN/lower HEATER OUT per channel; independently check each socket, polarity and lead route without supply energised.
Evidence: Channel cross-check
R—
Operator plus checker
Target: Each set-up
Status / closed: __________
RA-13 Specimen-related reaction or emissions
Potential harm: Fire, fumes, venting, explosion or pressure release depending on specimen
Operators, visitors, facility Controller is a heat source only; specimen chemistry, failure behaviour and test-cell controls vary by experiment.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Create and approve specimen-specific RA for battery/chemical/pressurised/combustible hazards, containment, ventilation, remote operation, fire response and safe exclusion zone.
Evidence: Approved specimen-specific risk assessment
R—
Experiment owner / H&S
Target: Each test programme and new sample type
Status / closed: __________
RA-14 Loss of cooling, ventilation or monitoring
Potential harm: Overheating after heater stopped, fumes or fire
Operator, specimen Heating process depends on external cooling, extraction and supervision; controller has no proven cooling interlock.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Check cooling and extraction before starting, monitor independent temperature, define ventilation-failure stop actions and supervise cooldown.
Evidence: Cooling/ventilation functional check
R—
Operator
Target: Each test
Status / closed: __________
RA-15 Emergency response, isolation not accessible
Potential harm: Delayed power removal, increased injury
Operator, bystanders External DC PSU and mains inlet can be switched off, but EAO is an operating enable, not safety-rated emergency stop.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Identify/test rated external DC isolator and safe-to-reach AC disconnect; train operators in alarm and evacuation response without approaching faulted apparatus.
Evidence: Emergency drill / isolation sign-off
R—
Facility owner / safety lead
Target: Before first use
Status / closed: __________
RA-16 Maintenance on energised equipment
Potential harm: Shock, arc, accidental energisation
Electrician/technician Separate mains supply and external DC heater sources; cabinet can remain energised from either.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Competent maintenance staff only. Isolate and secure BOTH mains and external DC sources, allow for stored energy, verify dead before touching, and document reinspection.
Evidence: Permit / lock-off record
R—
Maintenance lead
Target: Every intervention
Status / closed: __________
RA-17 Cable routing, leads crossing hinges / trip hazard
Potential harm: Abrasion, short, strain, trip, burns
Operator, staff Panel-mounted DC connectors, enclosure hinge and routed test leads require mechanical protection.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Secure cables and terminals; protect hinge-crossing loom, avoid heater/hot/abrasive edges, inspect banana retention and keep routes clear.
Evidence: Cable/clearance inspection
R—
Operator / electrical reviewer
Target: Initial installation and each visual check
Status / closed: __________
RA-18 Multiple channels loaded simultaneously
Potential harm: Combined heat load, shared 24 V failure, mistaken cross-channel actions
Operator, facility Each heater channel has a separate DC path and controller; the Mean Well 24 V logic supply is shared.
Status: design / stated arrangement; verify on equipment
R—
Assess combined specimen heat release, cooling/extraction, DC supply duty, operator attention and fault response; explicitly approve simultaneous heating if allowed.
Evidence: Two-channel capability approval
R—
Experiment owner
Target: Before two-channel runs
Status / closed: __________

Initial risk: before completing the further measures. Residual risk: after controls are implemented and verified. Neither is pre-scored; the responsible site assessor must complete both. Values selected on this page are for this browser session only; Print / Save PDF to retain the completed assessment.

Guidance: HSE risk assessment principles ↗. The scoring system below is a working template; follow the site-approved matrix and acceptance criteria where these differ.

Evidence required before routine live tests

The following are practical release checks, not a statement that they have been passed.

Do not rely on EAO heater enable as a safety-rated emergency stop. Site emergency isolation must act on the relevant independent energy source, without requiring the operator to approach a hot or faulted test.

Record for each experiment

Review this assessment following alterations to wiring/components, new specimen categories, any unexpected heating or faults, an incident or near miss, or changes to the work area/protective equipment.

Review and authorisation

Risk scoring, adequacy and effectiveness of controls, responsible persons, due dates and sign-off must be completed by competent local reviewers. Record reference to the approved site-specific specimen assessment.

Equipment / serial / location_______________________________________________
Specific test category or specimen RA number_______________________________________________
Electrical inspector / date_______________________________________________
Test owner / date_______________________________________________
H&S reviewer / date_______________________________________________
Approval / next review date_______________________________________________

References: Electrical overview, Reference Wiring R1, Operating procedure, HSE safe electrical work.